Jew-Hindu Bhai Bhai: The Popularity of Mein Kampf in India
Sometimes some articles are too disturbing to not make a comment.
The word Mein Kampf immediately brings to mind Adolf Hitler’s deluded dream and genocidal paranoia of the “Jewish peril”. Long the Bible of idiotic Aryan supremacist groups, the book seems to have found a rather new (or maybe) old niche market in India.
Sales of Mein Kampf, Adolf Hitler’s autobiography and apologia for his anti-semitism, are soaring in India where business students regard the dictator as a management guru.
Booksellers told The Daily Telegraph that while it is regarded in most countries as a ‘Nazi Bible’, in India it is considered a management guide in the mould of Spencer Johnson’s “Who Moved My Cheese”.
Sales of the book over the last six months topped 10,000 in New Delhi alone, according to leading stores, who said it appeared to be becoming more popular with every year.
Despite claims by many that the sales have to do with its value as a ‘management book’, underlying the rhetoric reveals the real sinister side.
Dr J Kuruvachira, Professor of Philosophy of Salesian College in Nagaland and who has cited Mein Kampf as a source of inspiration to the Hindu nationalist BJP, said he believed the book’s popularity was due to political reasons.
“While it could be the case that management students are buying the book, my feeling is that it has more likely influenced some of the fascist organisations operating in India and nearby,” he said. [emphasis added]
While the India Lobby seeks to emulate and learn from the Israeli Lobby in the US, for all the calls of Jew-Hindu bhai-bhai by the media and many like-minded organizations for greater collaboration in defeating “Islamic terrorism”, the underpinnings of Hindutva xenophobia show its much darker origins.
Mahatma Gandhi corresponded with the Fuhrer, pro-Independence leader Subhas Chandra Bose’s Indian National Army allied with Hitler’s Germany and Japan during the Second World War, and the Nazis drew on Hindu symbolism for their Swastika motif and ideas of Aryan supremacy.
66 Responses to “Jew-Hindu Bhai Bhai: The Popularity of Mein Kampf in India”
This website is full of such hatred for other religions (especially Hinduism) that it disgusts me to associate myself with it as a Sikh.
This website is full of such hatred for other religions (especially Hinduism) that it disgusts me to associate myself with it as a Sikh.
this is a Great web site (langar hall) and doesn't promote hatred toward anyone or any group. You just have trouble handling the truth.
"This website is full of such hatred for other religions (especially Hinduism) that it disgusts me to associate myself with it as a Sikh."
To the poster above who has calls himself "a Sikh":
What a baseless and self-serving remark. Hatred is one thing, but being aware, and informing oneself of Sikh History, including the obstacles and tyranny the Panth has faced does NOT constitute "hatred".
Hindu nationalism, Wahabbi Islam, and Evangelical Christianity are bigoted and intolerant philosophies – they are sworn enemies of not only the Sikh Faith, but ALL HUMANITY.
Lets not forget that hatred, intolerance and religious violence is, in fact, spread by your very own Indian politicians, namely the likes of – Varun Gandhi, Jagdish Tytler, RK Anand, Gandhis, Sajjan Kumar, Narendra Modi, and the stand-up guys at the RSS.
this is a Great web site (langar hall) and doesn’t promote hatred toward anyone or any group. You just have trouble handling the truth.
“This website is full of such hatred for other religions (especially Hinduism) that it disgusts me to associate myself with it as a Sikh.”
To the poster above who has calls himself “a Sikh”:
What a baseless and self-serving remark. Hatred is one thing, but being aware, and informing oneself of Sikh History, including the obstacles and tyranny the Panth has faced does NOT constitute “hatred”.
Hindu nationalism, Wahabbi Islam, and Evangelical Christianity are bigoted and intolerant philosophies – they are sworn enemies of not only the Sikh Faith, but ALL HUMANITY.
Lets not forget that hatred, intolerance and religious violence is, in fact, spread by your very own Indian politicians, namely the likes of – Varun Gandhi, Jagdish Tytler, RK Anand, Gandhis, Sajjan Kumar, Narendra Modi, and the stand-up guys at the RSS.
Indians are the first to invent racism in their literature according to author Joel Augustus Rogers.
Indians are the first to invent racism in their literature according to author Joel Augustus Rogers.
racism in your mind . this site spreading nothing.
racism in your mind . this site spreading nothing.
Hinduism is a cool religion that is also oriented towards peace and prosperity.,*~
Hinduism is a cool religion that is also oriented towards peace and prosperity.,*~
How about, we are all as bad as each other, but can't get ourselves to admit it?
How about, we are all as bad as each other, but can't get ourselves to admit it?
Observer,
There are people who cannot help being grumpy whingers. You seem to be one of those "na, main nahin munn da" (ROUGH TRANSLATION: no, i do not agree)die-hards.
Elected by Rajya Sabha….so? Rajya Sabha is one of our principal parliamentary institutions and how does it matter whether one is selected for Rajya sabha or elected by voters of a particular constituency? The party Manmohan Singh, Sonia, Ansari, etc represent has been returned by the Indian voters with a thumping mandate. does that mandate mean nothing to you? vast majority of the Indian population admires Manmohan and co irrespective of their faith/s; does that mean nothing to you?
Before Manmohan Singh, Giani Zail Singh was the Home Minister of India (elected from Hoshiarpur Lok Sabha constituency if i am not wrong) and later on became the President of India. Of course you would find it hard to acknowledge (forget appreciate) the maturity of the Indian democracy and grace which majority community has been showing in consistently electing/selecting non-Hindus to the top posts.
I am not sure whether you have heard about that chronic bachelor who had nothing but skecpticism for everyone and everything. his folks found one girl for our Mr. Skecptic. "hmmmmm she seems to be beautiful, well-mannered…everything is fine but …atta goondi hoyee hildee aa (ROUGH TRANSLATION: she shakes and stirs while kneading flour).
So whatever Hindus may do to make other communities feel comfortable in their shared home i.e. India, people like you would never acknowledge that Hindus could be nice ppl too.
Sher
Observer,
There are people who cannot help being grumpy whingers. You seem to be one of those “na, main nahin munn da” (ROUGH TRANSLATION: no, i do not agree)die-hards.
Elected by Rajya Sabha….so? Rajya Sabha is one of our principal parliamentary institutions and how does it matter whether one is selected for Rajya sabha or elected by voters of a particular constituency? The party Manmohan Singh, Sonia, Ansari, etc represent has been returned by the Indian voters with a thumping mandate. does that mandate mean nothing to you? vast majority of the Indian population admires Manmohan and co irrespective of their faith/s; does that mean nothing to you?
Before Manmohan Singh, Giani Zail Singh was the Home Minister of India (elected from Hoshiarpur Lok Sabha constituency if i am not wrong) and later on became the President of India. Of course you would find it hard to acknowledge (forget appreciate) the maturity of the Indian democracy and grace which majority community has been showing in consistently electing/selecting non-Hindus to the top posts.
I am not sure whether you have heard about that chronic bachelor who had nothing but skecpticism for everyone and everything. his folks found one girl for our Mr. Skecptic. “hmmmmm she seems to be beautiful, well-mannered…everything is fine but …atta goondi hoyee hildee aa (ROUGH TRANSLATION: she shakes and stirs while kneading flour).
So whatever Hindus may do to make other communities feel comfortable in their shared home i.e. India, people like you would never acknowledge that Hindus could be nice ppl too.
Sher
@Sher
Most of your stuff makes sense. But no one can deny the anti-sikh vitriol in some Hindus. That we have seen anti-Muslim stance of both Sikhs and Hindus, anti-Sikh stance of Hindus is perfectly believable, not mention anti-dalit, anti-southie, anti-chinkie tendencies.
@RSV
Are you saying the Judaism is a tolerant theology? That is news to me. Would love to read a reference.
History is written by the victors otherwise the historical heroes and villains would have been different.
@Sher
Most of your stuff makes sense. But no one can deny the anti-sikh vitriol in some Hindus. That we have seen anti-Muslim stance of both Sikhs and Hindus, anti-Sikh stance of Hindus is perfectly believable, not mention anti-dalit, anti-southie, anti-chinkie tendencies.
@RSV
Are you saying the Judaism is a tolerant theology? That is news to me. Would love to read a reference.
History is written by the victors otherwise the historical heroes and villains would have been different.
Observer,
As i said before, 1984 anti-sikh riots were an aberration and a blot on Indian democracy. But i would like to reassert these riots were isolated events and restricted to a few pockets where Congress-linked lumpen exercised influence or where abject poverty played perverse role.
would it be fine if we consider the number of people who were directly involved in killing easily identifiable male sikhs? few districts of Delhi, Kanpur, bokaro, Indore and few other districts. I would say 10 districts (if we take into consideration minor incidents too) witnessed these gory, dastardly attacks on Sikhs which led to the killing of approx 4000 sikhs. let me remind you there are over 625 districts in India.
i have condemned anti-sikh riots every time i have mentioned those 1984 tragic events and shall continue to do so for the rest of my life.
Now, how you can blame Indian democracy for riots which were restricted to isolated pockets and in which only a very small Indian (both Hindus and Muslims) population participated? why this sweeping generalisation ? why continue to label 1.1 billion people as ruthless killers of sikhs? why this acting precious while other communities are suffering similar calamities all over south asia?
India democracy did not fail. it was the leaders with clay feet who failed the democracy both in Delhi in 1984 and in Punjab for two decades.
You want to talk JUST about 1984 riots but not the events leading to Indira gandhi assassination, WHY? Punjabis (more sikhs than Hindus ironically) were massacred by fanatic Sikh terrorists for over two decades but you do not have a single word of sympathy for such innocent victims of terrorists' bullets?
You are conveniently blaming weak (implied) indian democracy for 1984 riots but did not sikh like YOU failed sikhi when they were mute witnesses to naked dance of mayhem let loose by the NAFRAT DE BANJARE (prophets of hatred) like Bhindranwala.
It was this fanatic who was ordering killings of people right inside Akal Takhat building which house the original Bir of Adi Granth and your conscience …your sikhi were lying comatose oblivious to the 'att da zulm'. WHY OBSERVER WHY? why are you selective in your revulsion for injustice?
You have quoted infamous Rajiv Gandhi words about giant tree falling and shaking earth whatever. This quote pales in front of dozens of speeches of that “Sant” of yours whose portrait now hangs in the holiest of the holy sikh shrines Harimnadir – Bhindranwala.
You have to give it to Bhindranwala as far as vitriolic is concerned. He would not beat around the bush, i must admit. “I would kill 5,000 Hindus in one hour…..” is just one small example of Bhindranbani.
Shall i go on Observer or would that suffice as an explanation of the fact that Indian democracy is much more stronger and forgiving than SOME Sikhs like you who would like every single person (exc Sikhs of course) to stay on their respective guilt trips for the rest of the 21st century because a small number of barbarians from amongst them were responsible for 1984 anti-sikh riots?
Just one last question: Tain ki dard na aaya?
Sher
Observer,
As i said before, 1984 anti-sikh riots were an aberration and a blot on Indian democracy. But i would like to reassert these riots were isolated events and restricted to a few pockets where Congress-linked lumpen exercised influence or where abject poverty played perverse role.
would it be fine if we consider the number of people who were directly involved in killing easily identifiable male sikhs? few districts of Delhi, Kanpur, bokaro, Indore and few other districts. I would say 10 districts (if we take into consideration minor incidents too) witnessed these gory, dastardly attacks on Sikhs which led to the killing of approx 4000 sikhs. let me remind you there are over 625 districts in India.
i have condemned anti-sikh riots every time i have mentioned those 1984 tragic events and shall continue to do so for the rest of my life.
Now, how you can blame Indian democracy for riots which were restricted to isolated pockets and in which only a very small Indian (both Hindus and Muslims) population participated? why this sweeping generalisation ? why continue to label 1.1 billion people as ruthless killers of sikhs? why this acting precious while other communities are suffering similar calamities all over south asia?
India democracy did not fail. it was the leaders with clay feet who failed the democracy both in Delhi in 1984 and in Punjab for two decades.
You want to talk JUST about 1984 riots but not the events leading to Indira gandhi assassination, WHY? Punjabis (more sikhs than Hindus ironically) were massacred by fanatic Sikh terrorists for over two decades but you do not have a single word of sympathy for such innocent victims of terrorists' bullets?
You are conveniently blaming weak (implied) indian democracy for 1984 riots but did not sikh like YOU failed sikhi when they were mute witnesses to naked dance of mayhem let loose by the NAFRAT DE BANJARE (prophets of hatred) like Bhindranwala.
It was this fanatic who was ordering killings of people right inside Akal Takhat building which house the original Bir of Adi Granth and your conscience …your sikhi were lying comatose oblivious to the 'att da zulm'. WHY OBSERVER WHY? why are you selective in your revulsion for injustice?
You have quoted infamous Rajiv Gandhi words about giant tree falling and shaking earth whatever. This quote pales in front of dozens of speeches of that “Sant” of yours whose portrait now hangs in the holiest of the holy sikh shrines Harimnadir – Bhindranwala.
You have to give it to Bhindranwala as far as vitriolic is concerned. He would not beat around the bush, i must admit. “I would kill 5,000 Hindus in one hour…..” is just one small example of Bhindranbani.
Shall i go on Observer or would that suffice as an explanation of the fact that Indian democracy is much more stronger and forgiving than SOME Sikhs like you who would like every single person (exc Sikhs of course) to stay on their respective guilt trips for the rest of the 21st century because a small number of barbarians from amongst them were responsible for 1984 anti-sikh riots?
Just one last question: Tain ki dard na aaya?
Sher
Sher, There you are finally the genie is out of the bottle. Bhindranwale was simply a stooge for greater game being played by Indian government at the centre. Indian Home Minister is sheilding a monster yet you love to blame the stooge instead of blaming those who created that monster. Everybody knows Zail Singh was promoted by Indira Gandhi, so whom should be blame the most . If home minister was sheilding Bhindranwale then what Indira Gandhi was doing, sleeping . Beacuse of these examples as you have given Indian Democracy has failed its people in protecting them , giving them prosperity. It is classic case of Fence eating the crop. If you are blaming bindranwale for the mayhem you have to have blame the Indian government for erecting this monster, Indian government cannot simply wash their hands in Punjab terrorism. They were the promoters of terrorism in Punjab.
Sher, There you are finally the genie is out of the bottle. Bhindranwale was simply a stooge for greater game being played by Indian government at the centre. Indian Home Minister is sheilding a monster yet you love to blame the stooge instead of blaming those who created that monster. Everybody knows Zail Singh was promoted by Indira Gandhi, so whom should be blame the most . If home minister was sheilding Bhindranwale then what Indira Gandhi was doing, sleeping . Beacuse of these examples as you have given Indian Democracy has failed its people in protecting them , giving them prosperity. It is classic case of Fence eating the crop. If you are blaming bindranwale for the mayhem you have to have blame the Indian government for erecting this monster, Indian government cannot simply wash their hands in Punjab terrorism. They were the promoters of terrorism in Punjab.
Stooge or no stooge Bhindran was a terrorist who had no compassion for the weak, the oppressed. he was an extremist who misinterpreted the sikh scriptures to suit his own perverse, supremacist ideology. he created demons where there were none. his hatred for Hindus and hinduism becomes indefensible as he was the head of Damdami Taksal. guess which granth finds equal reverence as Granth sahib at taksal HQ – Dasam Granth!!! Dasam Granth is nothing but a pure Hindu pothi. now you figure it out what Bhindran was ideologically speaking and how misplaced his hatred for Hindus was.
As far as fence eating the crop is concerned, you are right. Zail singh was a cunning politician who managed to become Punjab CM in spite of his non-Jat background. like chanakya, he Zail singh would do anything to finish his enemy (Darbara Singh) and he eventually succeeded in achieving his twisted aim – vanquishing darbara singh into oblivion. Indian govt of course has to blamed for three reasons. firstly for patronising a psychopath, secondly for not crushing terrorism right in the bud and lastly for ill-advised Op Blue Star. once again, yes the Indian govt was a co-promoter of terrorism in punjab in the initial stage before frankenstein came into his own. i am not a fan of BJP/RSS types but LK Advani was spot on for calling Bhindran a Bhasmasur.
Stooge or no stooge Bhindran was a terrorist who had no compassion for the weak, the oppressed. he was an extremist who misinterpreted the sikh scriptures to suit his own perverse, supremacist ideology. he created demons where there were none. his hatred for Hindus and hinduism becomes indefensible as he was the head of Damdami Taksal. guess which granth finds equal reverence as Granth sahib at taksal HQ – Dasam Granth!!! Dasam Granth is nothing but a pure Hindu pothi. now you figure it out what Bhindran was ideologically speaking and how misplaced his hatred for Hindus was.
As far as fence eating the crop is concerned, you are right. Zail singh was a cunning politician who managed to become Punjab CM in spite of his non-Jat background. like chanakya, he Zail singh would do anything to finish his enemy (Darbara Singh) and he eventually succeeded in achieving his twisted aim – vanquishing darbara singh into oblivion. Indian govt of course has to blamed for three reasons. firstly for patronising a psychopath, secondly for not crushing terrorism right in the bud and lastly for ill-advised Op Blue Star. once again, yes the Indian govt was a co-promoter of terrorism in punjab in the initial stage before frankenstein came into his own. i am not a fan of BJP/RSS types but LK Advani was spot on for calling Bhindran a Bhasmasur.
@Sher
"Dasam Granth is nothing but a pure Hindu pothi."
Great to find someone with the understanding of braj. How did you teach yourself ?
@Sher
"Dasam Granth is nothing but a pure Hindu pothi."
Great to find someone with the understanding of braj. How did you teach yourself ?
I don't know about the origins of Sikhism but it is definitely a friend of Hinduism. It is closer to Hinduism than it is to Islam. And Islam, Sikhism, Hinduism or even Christianity are not enemies of each other or even harmful in any way. You all are forgetting the real topic here – it is jews. They are the number one threat to the world. These sneaky suckers cause the most massive upheavals worldwide without even coming into the foreground. Group wise Islam, Christianity and judaism are part of one origin group. Hinduism, Buddhism, Sikhism, Jainism and others like Sufism are part of the Indian Sub Continent Origin Group. Those sneaky jews have been getting the Muslims and Christians to fight and kill each other. I don't even know why the 1984 Hindu-Sikh riots happened but i am sure it was more politically motivated than any other real cause. I wish the people of the world would take an unprejudiced look at Hitler. Why was it that Gandhi, Bose and others spoke to him and allied with him? Why was it that Hitler decided to take the motif from the glorious Hindu Religion of the past (i agree Hinduism today is diluted and so are others, because today the jew instituted materialistic corporate world has been unleashed on everyone. Wake up and realise that so many problems today owe their origins to jew manipulation. Hindu-Jew bhai bhai. My ass.
well well, we all know the truth! in order to make it in the world you must know the minds of the jews,since they dominate all sectors of the world's economy. this book gives you a complete outlook of who and what the jews are capable of. wish i had known about this book, before working with these jews. i probably would have made a good impact on my career.