<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sikh MTA Workers Say, &#8220;Don&#8217;t Brand Our Religion!&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thelangarhall.com/general/sikh-mta-workers-say-dont-brand-our-religion/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thelangarhall.com/general/sikh-mta-workers-say-dont-brand-our-religion/</link>
	<description>www.thelangarhall.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 02:02:14 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Can We Talk About Religion, Please? &#171; stellatex</title>
		<link>http://thelangarhall.com/general/sikh-mta-workers-say-dont-brand-our-religion/comment-page-1/#comment-27773</link>
		<dc:creator>Can We Talk About Religion, Please? &#171; stellatex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 01:55:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thelangarhall.com/?p=3668#comment-27773</guid>
		<description>[...] permitted if undertaken as a religious obligation: for instance, Sikh transit workers in New York may wear turbans. But not everything goes. Polygamy is outlawed. Nor would we allow human sacrifice, even if [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] permitted if undertaken as a religious obligation: for instance, Sikh transit workers in New York may wear turbans. But not everything goes. Polygamy is outlawed. Nor would we allow human sacrifice, even if [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Can We Talk About Religion, Please? - The Moral of the Story Blog - NYTimes.com</title>
		<link>http://thelangarhall.com/general/sikh-mta-workers-say-dont-brand-our-religion/comment-page-1/#comment-26829</link>
		<dc:creator>Can We Talk About Religion, Please? - The Moral of the Story Blog - NYTimes.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 04:06:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thelangarhall.com/?p=3668#comment-26829</guid>
		<description>[...] permitted if undertaken as a religious obligation: for instance, Sikh transit workers in New York may wear turbans. But not everything goes. Polygamy is outlawed. Nor would we allow human sacrifice, even if [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] permitted if undertaken as a religious obligation: for instance, Sikh transit workers in New York may wear turbans. But not everything goes. Polygamy is outlawed. Nor would we allow human sacrifice, even if [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Camille</title>
		<link>http://thelangarhall.com/general/sikh-mta-workers-say-dont-brand-our-religion/comment-page-1/#comment-19428</link>
		<dc:creator>Camille</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 05:37:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thelangarhall.com/?p=3668#comment-19428</guid>
		<description>justasikh, in North America meaning Canada, or in the U.S.? I haven&#039;t seen Sikh police where the logos on their dastars in the U.S., but maybe it&#039;s just not customary in my part of the country? (the only place where I have seen a dastar parallel the uniform/logo/pattern of other wear is in the London police force).

I definitely do think transit is different from a police/military force, but I don&#039;t (at this point) think any ought to require branding.

I hear where you&#039;re coming from, and I think there&#039;s merit to your argument, particularly around consistency. It does seem like a little bit of conversation within the community would perhaps also bridge differences of opinion, or at least flesh out internal pros/cons. 

That said, I don&#039;t think that this is a particularly &quot;negative&quot; story in that there doesn&#039;t seem to be extensive backlash (yet) -- the support for the MTA workers seems less contested. Perhaps this is because there are so many Sikhs in NYC, or perhaps this is because the policy seems offensive to a wide variety of people of faith. Maybe it&#039;s liberal bias. But the experiences seems very different than conversations on the kirpan, for example, or even the commentary we heard regarding the Texas case.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>justasikh, in North America meaning Canada, or in the U.S.? I haven&#8217;t seen Sikh police where the logos on their dastars in the U.S., but maybe it&#8217;s just not customary in my part of the country? (the only place where I have seen a dastar parallel the uniform/logo/pattern of other wear is in the London police force).</p>
<p>I definitely do think transit is different from a police/military force, but I don&#8217;t (at this point) think any ought to require branding.</p>
<p>I hear where you&#8217;re coming from, and I think there&#8217;s merit to your argument, particularly around consistency. It does seem like a little bit of conversation within the community would perhaps also bridge differences of opinion, or at least flesh out internal pros/cons. </p>
<p>That said, I don&#8217;t think that this is a particularly &#8220;negative&#8221; story in that there doesn&#8217;t seem to be extensive backlash (yet) &#8212; the support for the MTA workers seems less contested. Perhaps this is because there are so many Sikhs in NYC, or perhaps this is because the policy seems offensive to a wide variety of people of faith. Maybe it&#8217;s liberal bias. But the experiences seems very different than conversations on the kirpan, for example, or even the commentary we heard regarding the Texas case.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: justasikh</title>
		<link>http://thelangarhall.com/general/sikh-mta-workers-say-dont-brand-our-religion/comment-page-1/#comment-19132</link>
		<dc:creator>justasikh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 07:36:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thelangarhall.com/?p=3668#comment-19132</guid>
		<description>Camille Bhenji,

Most police forces in north america who have a turban policy have a color and emblem setup.  I know it is such in a few cities including my own.

Is the uniform of one authority (transit) really all that different from police/military... all are public service.   

It would be a different thing if McDonalds wanted to put a golden arch above the fifty.    Needless to say the Transit authorities uniform policy is a little lax if everyone else doesn&#039;t have to wear transit authority hats like police hats, etc.  Police uniforms have hats with them and thats where a turban style might come in.  

I guess I just get tired of seeing sikhs in the media in large majority when there&#039;s a negative thing attached to it... another story altogether.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Camille Bhenji,</p>
<p>Most police forces in north america who have a turban policy have a color and emblem setup.  I know it is such in a few cities including my own.</p>
<p>Is the uniform of one authority (transit) really all that different from police/military&#8230; all are public service.   </p>
<p>It would be a different thing if McDonalds wanted to put a golden arch above the fifty.    Needless to say the Transit authorities uniform policy is a little lax if everyone else doesn&#8217;t have to wear transit authority hats like police hats, etc.  Police uniforms have hats with them and thats where a turban style might come in.  </p>
<p>I guess I just get tired of seeing sikhs in the media in large majority when there&#8217;s a negative thing attached to it&#8230; another story altogether.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Camille</title>
		<link>http://thelangarhall.com/general/sikh-mta-workers-say-dont-brand-our-religion/comment-page-1/#comment-19115</link>
		<dc:creator>Camille</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 03:25:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thelangarhall.com/?p=3668#comment-19115</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m pretty sure Sikhs do not wear emblems on their paghs/dastars in the U.S. Armed Forces (particularly in light of the Army&#039;s ban on &quot;religious headgeear&quot;), but if I&#039;m wrong could someone correct me?

I think it&#039;s also important to separate out these different groups. While it&#039;s true, from an advocacy (and otherwise) standpoint we should be consistent, lack of consistency should not undermine a real problem for those Sikhs who work for the MTA. I don&#039;t think it&#039;s a prestige factor, but there is a fundamental difference in how we organize/treat civil officers in &quot;civilian&quot; professions from police/military forces.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m pretty sure Sikhs do not wear emblems on their paghs/dastars in the U.S. Armed Forces (particularly in light of the Army&#8217;s ban on &#8220;religious headgeear&#8221;), but if I&#8217;m wrong could someone correct me?</p>
<p>I think it&#8217;s also important to separate out these different groups. While it&#8217;s true, from an advocacy (and otherwise) standpoint we should be consistent, lack of consistency should not undermine a real problem for those Sikhs who work for the MTA. I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s a prestige factor, but there is a fundamental difference in how we organize/treat civil officers in &#8220;civilian&#8221; professions from police/military forces.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Singh</title>
		<link>http://thelangarhall.com/general/sikh-mta-workers-say-dont-brand-our-religion/comment-page-1/#comment-19110</link>
		<dc:creator>Singh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 02:14:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thelangarhall.com/?p=3668#comment-19110</guid>
		<description>I agree with justasikh on this one.  Aside from the fact that the MTA sounds childish - what makes thier request that Sikhs wear a logo differnent from the empblems worn by the armed forces.

Is it the prestige factor?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with justasikh on this one.  Aside from the fact that the MTA sounds childish &#8211; what makes thier request that Sikhs wear a logo differnent from the empblems worn by the armed forces.</p>
<p>Is it the prestige factor?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: justasikh</title>
		<link>http://thelangarhall.com/general/sikh-mta-workers-say-dont-brand-our-religion/comment-page-1/#comment-19091</link>
		<dc:creator>justasikh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 23:01:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thelangarhall.com/?p=3668#comment-19091</guid>
		<description>I can understand their concerns, does this apply to army outfits and police outfits too?

Where are the protests then?  I&#039;m okay with people having a position on this, but why isn&#039;t it consistent?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can understand their concerns, does this apply to army outfits and police outfits too?</p>
<p>Where are the protests then?  I&#8217;m okay with people having a position on this, but why isn&#8217;t it consistent?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Friday News Roundup: Link Lov &#171; Moving Beyond Differences</title>
		<link>http://thelangarhall.com/general/sikh-mta-workers-say-dont-brand-our-religion/comment-page-1/#comment-18916</link>
		<dc:creator>Friday News Roundup: Link Lov &#171; Moving Beyond Differences</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 21:27:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thelangarhall.com/?p=3668#comment-18916</guid>
		<description>[...] The Langar Hall, a blog for all things Sikh, posts on another discrimination case &#8211; New York City MTA workers fighting against having to pin MTA insigia to their [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Langar Hall, a blog for all things Sikh, posts on another discrimination case &#8211; New York City MTA workers fighting against having to pin MTA insigia to their [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
