Holding Members of Congress Accountable on Sikh Issues

220px-BhagatsinghthindYesterday, the Washington Post reported that a bipartisan group of 105 Members of Congress sent a letter urging the Department of Defense to end a presumptive ban on devout Sikhs who want to serve in the U.S. Armed Forces.  Over the past several years, civil rights group, The Sikh Coalition, has been working to address the issue of equal opportunity in the Armed Forces allowing all Sikhs to serve.  Since 2009, three Sikh Coalition clients—Major Kamaljeet Singh Kalsi, Captain Tejdeep Singh Rattan, and Corporal Simran Preet Singh Lamba—have received rare and historic accommodations to serve in the U.S. Army with their articles of faith intact.  A timeline of the efforts can be found here.

The Members wrote:

Dear Secretary Hagel,

We respectfully request that the United States Armed Forces modernize their appearance regulations so that patriotic Sikh Americans can serve the country they love while abiding by their articles of faith.

Devout Sikhs have served in the U.S. Army since World War I, and they are presumptively permitted to serve in the armed forces of Canada, India and the United Kingdom, among others. Notably, the current Chief of Staff of the Indian Army is a turbaned and bearded Sikh, even though Sikhs constitute less than two percent of India’s population. Throughout the world, and now in the U.S. Army, Sikh soldiers are clearly able to maintain their religious commitments while serving capably and honorably.

After hearing from their constituents, many Members of Congress who represent large constituencies of Sikhs signed onto this letter representing the importance and value of political engagement.  Unfortunately, there were also Members of Congress – some who represent Sikh constituents, who fund-raise within the Sikh community and even sit on the American Sikh Congressional Caucus who did not sign this letter.  This includes my own Member of Congress, Devin Nunes who “represents” (or that’s what we thought) a large constituency of Sikhs in the Central Valley of California.  Other missing signatories include Congressman LaMalfa and McClintock – who, in the past, have reached out to the Sikh community for support.

It isn’t enough to simply invite Members to our Gurdwaras and offer them saropay.  We have to hold our Members of Congress accountable once they leave our Gurdwaras and are challenged to support our issues on the Hill.  Our presence and political engagement will only make a difference when we continue to take a leadership role to address inequity in our society and establish a strong voice on behalf of the Sikh community.


bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark
tabs-top


2 Responses to “Holding Members of Congress Accountable on Sikh Issues”

  1. sant sipahi says:

    The focus by groups like the Sikh Coalition on military personnel regulations without acknowledging what the U.S. military actually does is to miss a burning forest for a tree. The U.S. military is not some neutral organization like a metropolitan transit authority, but rather it has been the perpetrator of untold suffering and destabilization the world over for decades.

    As Sikhs we have an injunction to fight tyranny, oppression, and injustice wherever we find it. Sikhs should be following their moral conscience and opposing America's unjust and illegal wars around the world, not fighting to be first in line in participating in them.

  2. Singh says:

    This is not a Sikh issue. It is an issue for *some* Sikhs who wish to serve in the American military industrial complex which loots the public treasury and diverts funds from education, infrastructure, and social services. It is an issue for some Sikhs who are happy to participate in a rampant kind of patriarchy where women can be sexually assaulted with impunity. It is an issue for some Sikhs who would happily force feed illegally detained prisoners who are on hunger strikes against Geneva code conventions. It is an issue for some Sikhs who are happy to be ordered to blow up Muslim bodies up because their new sovereign (their army commander, rather than the Guru) tells them to. It is an issue for some Sikhs who are happy to pledge their allegiance to the geopolitical interests of the United States, rather than to ask Waheguru for sarbat da bhalla.

    Justice for Shergill? Oops! Lets leave that to the 'community' organizations. Can't be bothered to speak truth to power now, can we?

Leave a Reply


We love hearing from our visitors, so please do leave your comments! No profanity, name calling, or discrimination, please - we try to keep The Langar Hall a clean, open, and hate-free zone. We reserve the right to edit or remove inappropriate comments.